Senior Porn Censor Claims He “Doesn’t Enjoy” Watching Porn All Day

Senior Porn Censor Claims He “Doesn’t Enjoy” Watching Porn All Day
May 15, 2013 By eChinacities.com

Given the fact that Feng Xiaogang had the word “censorship” censored during an acceptance speech from the China Directors Guild last month, we were all under the impression that the discussion of censorship was now a big no no in China. But no, apparently it is still okay sometimes, as a rare interview with 70 year-old Liu Xiaozhen was recently aired, discussing the mother of all censorship issues: pornography.

In the interview with Hunan Television, Liu, who is a senior porn censor, discusses his daily work routine though is quick to emphasize the fact that he doesn’t enjoy sitting in an office watching porn all day. Recalling his first day, Liu said, “It was awkward, my face and ears turned red and my heart skipped a beat.”

Last April, Liu and his colleagues were charged with the task of delving through 700 DVDs (remember a similar incident in Jiangsu back in January?) and classifying them into piles of “pornography”, “obscene”, and “others”.

According to the report, it is relatively easy to become a porn censor in China—all it takes is some special “training procedures” and then you too can join a crack team of officials like Liu’s (which, incidentally, is largely made up of middle-aged men).

See also: Hunan Officials Brawl Over Bus Dispute; One Bites Other’s Nose Off

Source: South China Morning Post

Warning:The use of any news and articles published on eChinacities.com without written permission from eChinacities.com constitutes copyright infringement, and legal action can be taken.

Keywords: censorship in China porn censor in China porn censor

0 Comments

All comments are subject to moderation by eChinacities.com staff. Because we wish to encourage healthy and productive dialogue we ask that all comments remain polite, free of profanity or name calling, and relevant to the original post and subsequent discussion. Comments will not be deleted because of the viewpoints they express, only if the mode of expression itself is inappropriate.