Foxconn Causes Another PR Problem for Apple in China

Foxconn Causes Another PR Problem for Apple in China
Jul 28, 2009 By Brian Schwarz, Journalist a , eChinacities.com

Apple has a brand image that marketing managers around the world can only dream about.  In the eyes of its incredibly loyal consumer base, Apple represents the pinnacle of innovation and coolness. Like many Western brands, Apple depends on suppliers in Asia to manufacture its popular products, such as the iPhone and the iPod. 

Led by the legendary Steve Jobs, the California-based company is widely-admired for its user-friendly products and design capabilities. Sometimes this outsourcing of manufacturing strategy can lead to serious legal and public image problems.

On July 16, a young employee of Chinese contract manufacturer Foxconn (also known in China as Hon Hai) committed suicide after being accused over a missing iPhone prototype, reported Businessweek citing mainland press reports. The staff member, Sun Danyong, 25, threw himself off the 12th floor of the building in southern China.

Concerned about the safety of Apple’s intellectual property, Foxconn took the issue a missing prototype very seriously. The missing phone was one of 16 prototypes held by the Taiwanese-owned company. Sun was reportedly responsible for shipping the prototypes back to Apple, which had received just 15 devices.

This tragedy sparked outrage online across the country.  Sina.com website said Sun's suicide had spawned speculation online that Sun had been beaten or detained by Foxconn staff. Foxconn said in a statement that it "would not allow any person or department to take matters beyond the limit of the law."

In a statement Foxconn’s Li Jinming apologized to Sun's family and said the incident reflected "the inadequacies of Foxconn internal management."

This is not the first time Foxconn has faced controversy over the treatment of its employees. A few years ago, London’s The Mail on Sunday reported workers at Foxconn’s Shenzhen factory toil for 15 hours a day, with a salary of only 27 pounds a month, living in dormitories housing 100 people.

In response to the British report, Apple initiated an investigation, interviewed over 100 employees, and eventually concluded in a report released that the working hours exceeded its standard 60 hour-per week work time and that workers often had to work six-day weeks. Apple admitted the hours were “excessive.”

Jill Tan, communication manager of Apple Asia, said at that time: “Our investigation found that our top IPod manufacturing partner, Foxconn, complies with our Supplier Code of Conduct in most areas and is taking steps to correct the violations we found.”

Foxconn spokesman Edmund Ding was quoted as saying: “Those having some fundamental professionalism would know it is impossible for this kind of thing to happen at Foxconn. The Mail on Sunday is a tabloid in Britain. Key foreign media who follows the code of professionalism didn’t publish this.”

From its Taiwanese base, Foxconn has expanded rapidly in China in recent years. Along with its Hong Kong-listed subsidiary the company employs 200,000 workers and even has its own police force.  In 2007, it employed a total of 360,000 people in scores of factories worldwide, from Malaysia to Mexico.

Apple has a history of keeping new product information in the hands of very few people. According to recent report in the New York Times, few companies are more secretive than Apple, or as punitive to those who dare violate the company’s rules on keeping tight control over information.

Employees have been fired for leaking news tidbits to outsiders, and the company has been known to spread disinformation about product plans to its own workers, claimed the US newspaper. “They make everyone super, super paranoid about security,” Mark Hamblin, who worked on the iPhone. “I have never seen anything else like it at another company.”

Brian Schwarz is author of the China Challenges blog found here:
http://chinachallenges.blogs.com/my_weblog/

Warning:The use of any news and articles published on eChinacities.com without written permission from eChinacities.com constitutes copyright infringement, and legal action can be taken.

0 Comments

All comments are subject to moderation by eChinacities.com staff. Because we wish to encourage healthy and productive dialogue we ask that all comments remain polite, free of profanity or name calling, and relevant to the original post and subsequent discussion. Comments will not be deleted because of the viewpoints they express, only if the mode of expression itself is inappropriate.