The Sinister Side of the English Teaching Industry in China

The Sinister Side of the English Teaching Industry in China
Mar 28, 2012 By Thomas Hale , eChinacities.com

The story of the English language and its educational relationship with Modern China runs parallel to the story of China and its relationship with the West. Lest we forget, it was not until Deng Xiaoping ascended to the pinnacle of Chinese government and opened his nation up to the outside world that English began to take on the importance that we see today. China's anglophone aspirations and its economic progress have come hand in hand, each influencing and moulding the other. Today, the role and status of the English language is one of the most fascinating and perplexing aspects of China, both contributing to and yet undermining its growing economic might.

English teaching in China, once seen as the dreamy occupation of free-spirited travellers, has grown into a very serious industry that makes very serious money. According to the Guardian, there are today over 30,000 organisations or companies offering private English classes in China. When the costs of extra-curricular lessons are taken into account, the financial weight of English-language learning in China surely dwarfs any other educational drive in human history. It is, of course, the power of this industry and the raw appetite of so many Chinese to study English (roughly 20% of the population, at any given time) that fuels the import of native-English speakers to China each year.

These teachers are typically employed at private schools, such as Disney English or English First – schools which offer additional support for young children in learning English. For many Chinese, these schools represent a considerable financial sacrifice. Chinese parents, recognising that a future without English in a congested and swamped job market may be a bleak future indeed, invest huge amounts of their own money and their children's time in the hope of reaping the benefits of early English-language exposure.

Learning English: causes economic growth of vice versa?

Some may suggest that China's economic growth is a direct consequence of its embrace of the English language. Others argue that English has had little impact on China's growth, and that, in a chicken-and-egg reversal, it is the growth that breeds the almost irrelevant side-effect of wider English learning. Economic growth and its myriad social consequences make these conflicts of opinion almost impossible to resolve. Yet it remains clear that languages have the power to confer social status like nothing else. We need only consider the debasement of the Anglo-Saxon language in the last millennium, first at the hands of French after the Norman Conquest, then repeatedly at the hands of the literate elite's Latin through the Enlightenment, to see that the prestige a language enjoys can come to dominate all areas of society.

These moments in history are frequent, and such a moment has arrived in China. Nothing that has come before is, however, quite like this: an emergent middle-class, driven by a desire to see their (often only) children succeed economically, now habitually resort to extra-curricular English tuition as a primary means of guaranteeing their child's future. English has become something more than a practical tool; it has become a symbolic marker of social class. The middle-class is fast becoming defined through English, but, for many reasons, this relationship is problematic.

Is the cost worth the benefit?

Without wishing to undermine the pursuits of English teachers in China, it must be admitted that the industry has become something of a leech on many families’ resources and time. Consider the draconian educational pressures exerted on Chinese children today – in a typical middle school in the months leading up to the Gao Kao it is not uncommon for students to rise at 5.30 and return home, intoxicated on fatigue, at 22:00. A weekend at English First, one suspects, must conjure images of camels' backs and threateningly-positioned straws.

These pressures have risen exponentially in the Chinese education system alongside the rise of English, and it is often English alone that contributes to the many extra hours of study each evening or weekend. Widely maligned techniques such as rote memorisation are most closely associated with the learning of English, probably due to large class sizes rendering direct interaction impossible. Whilst many qualified foreign teachers greatly enhance Chinese students' learning experience, many others, imported to teach English solely on the basis of their mother tongue, are unqualified, and the benefit they offer to their students is negligible or illusory.

We may also wonder whether the need for English has not been exaggerated. China's economy is increasingly becoming self-sufficient, as export-driven profits are translated into internal construction. Further, China's trade with the United States does not require its entire population to devote much of their adolescence to a foreign tongue. International trade has for millennia subsisted upon a small number of bilingual experts. Students, at this very moment, will be sat, paralyzed by boredom, learning words or phrases for the sake of the act itself and the fraught social meaning it conveys, rather than the prospect of future use. How many of those twilight hours spent memorising the words 'pencil sharpener' and 'foreign student's dormitory' will ever surface into some kind of linguistic daylight?

Opportunity or exploit?

The hundreds of thousands of foreigners who yearly make the pilgrimage to China in order to teach their mother tongue rarely consider the implications of their presence. The private-schools they are employed by are, in one respect, offering considerable educational opportunities for Chinese children. Yet from another, more sinister angle, they are exploiting a collective middle-class neurosis about an essential need to learn English at all costs.

The huge profits of some of these schools, and their extortionate prices, lend some credence to the latter perspective. The outrageous time-tables of some Chinese state schools are simply rendered more severe, more damaging, by the presence of additional private schools: not content with giving up every waking hour of the week to learning, the weekend is similarly disposed of.

Chinese children frequently become enslaved by a circular culture of English learning, where the joys of language-acquisition are crushed by a background noise of economic pressure; of a need to learn in order to get a job, rather than to learn for the hidden wonders of a reinvented means of communication. It is difficult to enjoy a meal that has been force-fed.

Beyond this, though, there may come a time when China begins to feel its national identity compromised by the dominance of a neo-colonial language. Certainly, if China becomes the leading global economy, attitudes to its own language will radically change. If and when that time comes we may well see the current climate of English education – a multi-billion dollar industry – fade away into a distant memory, and all those force-fed meals spectacularly vomited up in a furore of linguistic revolution.
 

Related links
A Tried Method: Using Psychology to Get to Students
China English Teaching Horror Stories
Insider’s Guide to Teaching English in China

Warning:The use of any news and articles published on eChinacities.com without written permission from eChinacities.com constitutes copyright infringement, and legal action can be taken.

Keywords: English teaching industry China cost of learning English in China private English organizations China bad side of English schools in China

19 Comments

All comments are subject to moderation by eChinacities.com staff. Because we wish to encourage healthy and productive dialogue we ask that all comments remain polite, free of profanity or name calling, and relevant to the original post and subsequent discussion. Comments will not be deleted because of the viewpoints they express, only if the mode of expression itself is inappropriate.

Mike有

The 'sinister angle' is hilarious. Thank you, it is hard for me to find anything that funny to read. The Chinese carefully guard the right to overcharge their countrymen for English lessons and keep the lion's share. English school profits can be huge and the Chinese do not share. If you don't believe me, try to open your own school. No, it's not impossible, but compared to a local Chinese person, it is much more difficult for a foreigner to open an English school. Thanks again for this funny article.

Further, the Chinese force feed English like they force feed other subjects. I assure you I see no evidence of British or American force behind this country's policies, but that's only my experience. Please let us all know when you have proof that westerners make education decisions in China.

May 11, 2012 06:05 Report Abuse

Mike有

This article is ridiculous.

Apr 03, 2012 06:13 Report Abuse

dano

I truly did not know they stacked da bian so high.

Why do you feel your bile rise when you know it's true.

English is a real currency. It facilitates trade and relationships worldwide unlike any other language.
Get used to it. It's just the way it is.
Your self hating is so obvious. I don't know why you loathe English .
You might as well despise the air you breathe and the water you drink.

Apr 02, 2012 08:15 Report Abuse

dano

PS...

English cannot be manufactured by mind numbed robots.. It actually needs critical thinking to be learned.

Maybe that is why some folks think it should just be given away like a prize ina box of cereal.

Apr 02, 2012 08:21 Report Abuse

Badbeef

Michael D.,
Your myopia likely stems from old age,or from some psychosis.Where in my write up did I describe people from the US,Australia,Newzealand as "Talk about the devil and it comes"? We are waiting for you to bring something new to the debate,instead of vomiting stale stuff about your interactions with the Chinese community.Secondly you failed to understand the meaning behind "facilitator"as used above.All English language teachers in the world are "facilitators" to their students,because teaching has become more student-centred.The time has passed when students looked up to teachers to spoon-feed them with facts.This is why I said the main mission of English language teachers in China should be that of facilitators.They help build bridges for their students.I didn't say teachers are "middlemen" for job seekers.If you can't comprehend simple English,it beats my imagination what you taught your students for nine years.You even tried to place your numbed brains on a high moral pedestal by saying my English skills suck.If we were to take a closer look at your English,I don't think you will have a leg to dance on.Hear you:"When English speaking people or US students...". I presume you were struggling to say:"English speakers".Always remember:"Those who live in glass houses should not throw stones".

Mar 30, 2012 00:57 Report Abuse

pete

Native speakers with university degrees in unrelated fields are not qualified to teach English. At least get a CELTA or TESOL certification so you will have some idea about the issues involved and techniques required to teach English. Cambridge actually has a 2 week course about teaching English to children. Adults and children are quite different is the way they learn language.

Mar 31, 2012 19:00 Report Abuse

MissA

Pete: Unfortunately, the two-week CELTYL extension is offered relatively rarely anywhere, and as far as I can tell, there are no centres in China accredited to offer it.

Mar 31, 2012 20:13 Report Abuse

Smitty

Pete,
B.S.!!!!!!! There are people that are fine E.S.L. teachers that don't have a teaching certificate. Whilst there are others that don't teach well. It depends on the individual!! :( Don't generalize!! :(

Jun 27, 2012 07:06 Report Abuse

Badbeef

Folks,
After reading through all your reactions,I came away with the feeling that Chinese are right to say foreigners don't understand them.Else,how come we fail to grasp the exact reasons why there's this English language craze in China for a long time now.First ,it's worth noting that the initial reason to study English for Chinese is not to know or master all its contours.Rather English is learnt because it can enable them live and work abroad.Every language expert knows that when you learn language in a leisurely way,you enjoy not only it's beauty,but also the surprising depth you gain about the language.The pressure under which students in China prepare for the College entrance exam and other class exams is not different from the pressure their parents exert on them to study English.Criticisms about some of the shortcomings of Chinese education system,like memorization is almost a stale song on this forum now,but we must keep in mind that if these shortcomings have not yet been corrected,all the wise ideas,all the theories about language learning are being dumped into the same mess.English language teachers in China are just mainly feeding ideas into a defective memorization machine.There should actually be no correlation between English language learning and the rapid economic development.Language learning should have taken its own pace,but I`m afraid that has not been the case.You don't learn English or any other language with same speed with which you buy and sell on Taobao.
My second thrust centres on the learning of English for geo-political reasons,which is equally as important as the first,but which has all along been ignored in this debate.I listened to Yang Rui on CCTV 9 on e morning and he and his panel were talking about SINO/Indian relations.He raised the idea that the qualitative advantage that India had over China when it came to language use is dwindling.From this perspective,you would easily understand that English is not forcefully learnt as an end,but as a means to an end.When you learn English to compete for global dominance,global resources,and to carve out a place for you among the complicated global players,at times you do so by paying more attention to speed than to quality.English in itself is a carrier of culture,and there's just no way you can dissociate the cultural elements from the language and only go for the linguistic ones.When the Chinese,for instance say:"Shuo Chao Chao,Chao Chao dao",a loose translation will give you something like:"Talk about the devil,and it comes".Unless you know what Chao Chao represented at a given moment and the context in which it was used,you may not be able to fully understand this statement.When you ask students in China what they know about English people,there's the likelihood that you will be told English people are gentalemen.But if you were to dig further know how gentlemanly they are,they would tell you English people dress up well,carry an umbrella,and drink tea.Nobody will mention good habits like opening doors for women,not jumping lines,you name them.What does this imply? It means only the linguistic aspect of English is taken care of in China,and little attention and time are allocated to the cultural components of the language.Until this is done,the sloppy manner in which English is learnt will continue.Get the best"native speakers" as much as you want,that will not change a thing if English language learaning is mostly meant to facilitate immigration,job opportunities and closing the gap between competing neighbours and other adversaries.The debate about unqualified teachers,native speakers is a fake one.The big problem here is the intial motivation to learning English.Chinese may not outrightly need English,since they have a language of their own,but if they do,they should be a perfect understanding of why they need it.In this wise,all the various shareholders in English language teaching,while going about their jobs should keep in mind that they are not here to make Englishmen,Americans out of Chinese while teaching them English,but to serve as facilitators,which is even the original reason for coming here.

Mar 29, 2012 20:19 Report Abuse

dano

Evil?

I tell you what you naysayers; go in to work tomorrow and tell you boss you want to work for free.

BU YAO QIAN.

If you want to be paid as much as you can get your company to pay you, then you must be evil too.

Who says you are really worth it?
No, you are evil, very evil to want to be paid for your time talent and ability.
If you sell something, you want the lowest price the customer will give you, right?

Xenophobic morons and Hypocrites. Jealousy does not suit you.

Mar 29, 2012 08:42 Report Abuse

Ennius21

When there is a demand for a service, then there should be a supply. And the higher the demand, then the greater the price that can be charged for this service. This is a basic law of economics.
The Chinese people themselves have encouraged the rise of these expensive English educational institutions. And they built this strenuous educational system, that turns their young people into machines.
These English schools are only filling a slot that Chinese society has provided. And only the Chinese people can change this situation. And someday they probably will.
But in the meantime, I respect the hard-working English teachers coming over here, leaving their native lands, to help Chinese children in their studies. There is nothing sinister about it. Just normal economics.

Mar 29, 2012 06:42 Report Abuse

dano

sin·is·ter? ?[sin-uh-ster]
adjective
1.
threatening or portending evil, harm, or trouble; ominous: a sinister remark.
2.
bad, evil, base, or wicked; fell: his sinister purposes.
3.
unfortunate; disastrous; unfavorable: a sinister accident.
4.
of or on the left side; left.
5.
Heraldry . noting the side of an escutcheon or achievement of arms that is to the left of the bearer ( opposed to dexter).

Now which of these definitions are you holding on to...II have to believe by your self loathing ..it must be the #2- ENGLISH IS EVIL Definition.

EVIL, REALLY?

Mar 29, 2012 01:38 Report Abuse

carlstar

Western powers on the decline?
USA has merely faulted and when it gets back in stride it will be the 90s all over again in terms of economy.
Out of isolation it turned the tide of war and then out of depression it did it again.
Also you can't correct poor pronunciation over night. It is a case of a native tongue affecting the new language and learning from those that have the same issue.

Mar 29, 2012 03:51 Report Abuse

Mike Gill

Errr the US economy is finished , or hasnt anyone noticed or if they have , they arent saying ? Dont hold your breath waiting for its recovery

Apr 01, 2012 16:53 Report Abuse

carlstar

Too much time spent on schooling. Too much homework. Too much sitting and listening.
Schools are about the same as watching poorly made documentaries all day long. You can't ask questions, you are told what to know and if you come to teach English and try to do it differently, well good luck. Nuff said

Places mentioned in the OP were Disney and English first I think. They charge up the wazoo and pay their teachers peanuts in comparison. Someone is making a lot of money out of English teaching and it isn't the teachers. The Chinese are screwing over their own people by raising prices, while the teacher is earning the same or less than they did 5 years ago.

Mar 28, 2012 19:12 Report Abuse

MikeC

I think the debate is a healthy debate but does not necessite rudeness to each other. As an English person I can appreciate some of the values of learning a language which has some value in world communication and trade. I hope that many of the people teaching in China are also learning. Learning the language and learning about the culture and the people. China is little understood by much of the world and this exchange could have much more value than just the language. The world is one country and China an important component.

Mar 28, 2012 13:21 Report Abuse

dano

Gag me with a spoon...

Exploitation? Of the emergent middle class... I would laugh except, you are serious.

FYI the world is NOT going to learn Chinese despite the 1.36 Billion Chinese that occupy the 3rd Rock.

English is the only transferable global currency.

If we make it they will come?

Hog wash.

Some body has to sell it beyond simply naming a cheap price for the goods.

You are totally off your nut. inexorably out of your league.

Go back to your drawing board Junior Space Man and see what else you can proffer.

PS, The active voice is better than the passive voice when writing.



Mar 28, 2012 08:27 Report Abuse

pete

Actve voice is generally preferred for narrative writing. Passive voice is more frequently used in academic writing as it seems more objective.

Mar 31, 2012 18:48 Report Abuse

dano

Passive voice bores the reader by its implied arrogance.

It allows the author to shirk his responsibility when he writes something as asinine and stupid as the piece we are commenting on.

Apr 01, 2012 05:03 Report Abuse