Why Is China Reluctant to Abandon North Korea?

Why Is China Reluctant to Abandon North Korea?
Mar 11, 2012 By eChinacities.com

Editor's note: The following article was written by a prominent Chinese blogger named Wang Jinsi (王锦思). The article discusses why, even when it seems that it isn't in China's best interest, it insists on maintaining a strong relationship with the mythical hermit kingdom, North Korea.

Relationship is not all good

North Korea and China have a close interdependent relationship, like that of two blood brothers. However, the hardline policies of North Korea, China's little brother, often leave China in an uncomfortable position, making their relationship one filled with as much love as there is hate. Despite the fact that the Chinese public opinion of North Korea is extremely low, the Chinese government does not intend to abandon it. As far as they are concerned, the dish may be tasteless, but it would be a pity to throw it away.

Be that as it may, Sino-North Korean relations are not completely inseparable these days. In June 2009, after North Korea conducted their second nuclear test, China was left humiliated, and the leaders at Zhongnanhai were no doubt shaking silently with anger at their little brother. On May 29th 2009, days after the second test was conducted, the North Korean Foreign Ministry, who apparently felt that it had nothing to lose, issued a strong critical statement against China and Russia, who were participating in an emergency UN Security Council meeting at the time: "They are kowtowing to the Americans, blindly following them." Since that time, both sides have grown increasingly critical toward one another.  

For example, in an editorial published by the Global Times – a party-run newspaper –the term "ungrateful" (忘恩负义) was used in reference to North Korea, which would once have been considered an inconceivable thing to say. The editorial had other choice words for North Korea aswell: "If the hundreds of thousands in the Chinese People's Volunteer Army hadn't gone over and helped the Korean People's Army fight their bloody war shoulder to shoulder, there wouldn't be a North Korea today. In recent years, North Korea has conducted two nuclear tests, repeatedly violated international agreements, and many Chinese people are asking:‘Are we still able to refer to our two countries as blood brothers'? North Korea's nuclear testing has ruined the foundations of our bilateral relations."

Four reasons China will not abandon North Korea

Two years after this incident, Sino-North Korean relations have cooled off somewhat. Yet, despite these continuing clashes, it seems that China refuses to abandon North Korea, and is in fact determined to keep on slanting its policies in North Korea's favour, providing economic support, food aid etc. The reasons for this continued support are as follows:

1) Ideologically, China and North Korea's social systems both still operate under the banner of Marxism, and in this day and age, other Marxist brethren have become quite hard to come by.

2) The "peace" of the Korean War cost China at least 300,000 Chinese casualties. If China were to just give that up, the widows and relatives of those deceased would likely be rather furious. Not to mention, the whole little brother relationship with North Korea is a big part of China's mainstream propaganda system, and it can't be changed that easily.

3) When China's strategic interests come into conflict with those of Japan or the United States, China likes to have a buffer to end the stalemate between the countries. As it has traditionally done, China still hopes that North Korea will act as its shield, and during these critical moments on the international stage, do things that are not convenient for China to do. And even if North Korea goes too far, other countries will ask China to step in and deal with North Korea (as it doesn't really listen to anyone else), which makes China look more important. However, "When a neighbouring country starts conducting nuclear tests right on China's borders, China will not turn a blind eye."

4) There are still a number of Chinese people who have a soft spot for North Korea, such as Kong Qingdong (孔庆东), the infamous Peking University professor who frequently gets in trouble for his super national opinions (In January 2012, he called Hong Kong residents "the dogs of British imperialists" during a webcast interview). Suffice it to say, even with low public opinion of North Korea, China's support is still considered a core part of the country's national character.

In summary, even though supporting North Korea is both strenuous and costly – not to mention it is not all that mutually beneficial – China will continue to do so. But North Korea should take note of China's new tone, as could be seen at the 2011 Sino-North Korean Summit Meeting: North Korea, my boy, I'll continue to help you build yourself up, but don't do anything too stupid, or I'll be the one that looks bad.
 

Source: ifeng
 

Related links
Opinion: Chinese Media Should not Mislead Public on Foreign Affairs
Decisions, Decisions: How Will China Position Itself in Asia
Glimpses of Mysterious North Korea

Warning:The use of any news and articles published on eChinacities.com without written permission from eChinacities.com constitutes copyright infringement, and legal action can be taken.

Keywords: Sino-North Korean relations Chinese editorial on North Korea China and the hermit kingdom China public opinion of North Korea China reluctant abandon north korea

5 Comments

All comments are subject to moderation by eChinacities.com staff. Because we wish to encourage healthy and productive dialogue we ask that all comments remain polite, free of profanity or name calling, and relevant to the original post and subsequent discussion. Comments will not be deleted because of the viewpoints they express, only if the mode of expression itself is inappropriate.

James

I still don't really get the use of misused terminology. Words like 'if North and South Korea unite it will mean there is an American ally next door!'. I mean we all know that China and America are economic giants and there may be uncomfortable economic competition. But China will benefit most from a reunification of the country because of its proximity and cultural links. But why is it that military terms are still used in 2012 without a military conflict. There is no military conflict between America and China or NATO and China. There is no enemy. Both China and America want to help North Korea come out of its secretive society to live peacefully without any threat in the region or threat to world security. The term ally in our current generation is therefore an incorrect use of the word. Strategic partner is a better term because that is how the rest of us in the world view China. AS China continues to open up to foreign investment both outward and inward how could the continuing status of North Korea be of benefit? Look how Hong Kong has benefited China. The EU sees China as a growing world power but they are not by any means viewed as a threat or as an enemy so as to resort to the term 'ally' vis a vis America or NATO. Enemies and allies become so by threats and invasions of others. I am an EU citizen and I want China to help North Korea very much indeed.

Apr 07, 2012 13:14 Report Abuse

carlstar

Wouldn't that be against the WTO? or at least the ideas of free trade that China has signed onto with the rest of the world.
This is the 21st century and not the 20th century. If China started singing that song then you have Russia talking about how it created the nth and then every other country in the world saying that they signed up to free trade etc.
Putin cried over an election, he is likely to kill over money in his area of influence.

Mar 12, 2012 07:11 Report Abuse

carlstar

that assumes that the sth would not like the idea that nth and sth reunited. If china could help with that then the sth would love china and the US may also love China for it as the sth korean influence would make a great diplomatic tie in the whole asian and pacific region. Win win. US and China say they want to work together, then this is how they can do it, they both win a bit and lose a bit but the out come is huge.

Mar 12, 2012 07:03 Report Abuse

red

Much like the actual Korean war China is just using NK.

Mar 12, 2012 02:19 Report Abuse

carlstar

the rush of Koreans in the north into china would be too unbalancing to the system and would create.... issues that it may not be able to crush quick enough. Would the people be pro chinese or pro sth korean is another issue.

Mar 12, 2012 06:56 Report Abuse