In Shift to Post-Industrial Economy, Beijing Will Overtake Shanghai

In Shift to Post-Industrial Economy, Beijing Will Overtake Shanghai
Jun 14, 2016 By eChinacities.com

Editor’s Note: This translated article is an opinion piece by Renmin University economic researcher Gao Wang. Gao discusses the link between the economic growth of political centers in China and the nation’s shift from an industrial to a post-industrial economy. He concludes that Beijing will overtake Shanghai and become China’s economic center as the economy changes.

Let’s take a look at the economic strength and decline of Beijing and Shanghai. Ten years ago, I ran a comparison study concerning economic development in Nanjing, Suzhou, and Wuxi. However, the results of a comparison between Shanghai and Beijing’s make my case about China’s shifting economy and economic centers even clearer.  

Where is China’s Economic Center?
People often ask: which city in China is the most economically powerful? I think that 90 percent of people would answer Shanghai. Few people think of Beijing. 100 years after the end of the Qing Dynasty and Shanghai has a strong position in China as the nation’s economic center. While people think of Beijing as China’s political and cultural center, and consumer center, they never think of Beijing as the nation’s economic center.

However, times are changing. Look at the chart pictured here:

The chart shows that in 1978, Beijing’s GDP was only worth 40 percent of Shanghai GDP’s. However, in 2013, Beijing GDP was worth 90.2 percent of Shanghai’s. In 2015, it was worth 92%. Shanghai’s growth rate was only larger than Beijing’s in the early 1990s and in 2004. At this rate, Beijing’s GDP will surpass Shanghai’s in six or seven years and Beijing will become China’s economic center.

How is This Possible?
Many people could not imagine this. Beijing is not an industrial city or the nation’s financial trading center. How could Beijing’s economy catch up with Shanghai’s?

This situation is not limited to Beijing and Shanghai. Many other places are experiencing a similar trend. Simply put, in the past, in many provinces, the political and economic centers were different cities. Now, in many provinces, they are in the same city. This can be seen in Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Hebei, and other provinces. Capital cities like Nanjing, Hangzhou, and Shijiazhuang are much economically stronger than non-capital cities like Suzhou, and Ningbo. In other cases the provincial capital completely dominate the political and economic spheres like Chengdu in Sichuan and Hefei in Anhui. Chengdu recently annexed Chaohu, while Hefei swallowed up Jianyang, both securing each city’s status as a true leviathan.

In Shanxi and Northeast China (Liaoning, Jilin, and Heilongjiang) many prefecture-level cities are experiencing economic recessions. Taiyuan, Shenyang, Changchun, and Harbin face economic difficulties but are still experiencing growth.

Does Geography Matter?
Therefore, the root of the growth and decline of Beijing and Shanghai comes from the fact that the China’s economy has changed. In the industrial era, capital was king. Port and trade cities with good geography, like those in the Yangtze River Delta and Pearl River Delta, grew quickly. Suzhou, Wuxi, and Nanjing developed more quickly than Hangzhou and Ningbo.

However, China has now entered a post-industrial period. Future economic development will come from the “light economy:” information technology and the service economy. These do not depend on a geographical advantage and often do not consist of tangible goods.

The “light economy” requires resources like human resources, education, administration, and the like. These are better in Beijing than in Shanghai, and better in a first-tier city than a lower-level city. Things like mineral resources, cheap labor, and low taxes matter less in the post-industrial era.

Source: IFeng

Warning:The use of any news and articles published on eChinacities.com without written permission from eChinacities.com constitutes copyright infringement, and legal action can be taken.

Keywords: Chinese economics China economy

4 Comments

All comments are subject to moderation by eChinacities.com staff. Because we wish to encourage healthy and productive dialogue we ask that all comments remain polite, free of profanity or name calling, and relevant to the original post and subsequent discussion. Comments will not be deleted because of the viewpoints they express, only if the mode of expression itself is inappropriate.

1

Guest626460
comment|71807|69606

Great article. Nice statistics. More articles like this please! :)

Jun 21, 2016 23:32 Report Abuse

2

Guest388182
comment|71670|43131

what's a post environmental apocalypse economy...

Jun 14, 2016 15:09 Report Abuse

3

Guest922618
comment|71669|102513

A shift to service industry would horrorible fail in china... there is just no service and also no mindset to actually DO something for your customer. Fast bucks, then gtfo. Service? Can't reach that phone number anymore

Jun 14, 2016 13:50 Report Abuse

4

kuntmans
comment|71667|307009

Beijing has always led Shanghai culturally as well.

Jun 14, 2016 12:23 Report Abuse